Infobright Blog
Tags: OUR BLOGS
RECENT COMMENTS
[#8896] weight loss natural comments on Infobright On The Cloud
[#8895] shankar35425 comments on Freewheel.tv Using Infobright Community Edition (ICE) in Production
[#8894] harleyshenoy comments on Freewheel.tv Using Infobright Community Edition (ICE) in Production
[#8892] craigslistz22 comments on Infobright User's Blog about Infobright and Load Speed
[#8891] craigslistz22 comments on Agile for Data Warehouse Projects?
[#8890] craigslistz22 comments on Infobright On The Cloud
[#8889] Jeff Kibler comments on Loading Data in Infobright on Amazon EC2 using DLP
[#8888] MKTMJN comments on Loading Data in Infobright on Amazon EC2 using DLP
[#8887] Simon250 comments on ICE User Tests ICE vs InnoDB
[#8886] rohaangee comments on Infobright User's Blog about Infobright and Load Speed
you compare very well.i think your thoughts are good and you think very well about this topic.thanks for taking time to discus this such a nice post.christian forum
In my opinion you have placed great post. I really like your blogs keep providing authentic information. It can be useful for users. Thanks for nice post. Craigslist Houston
It would be interesting to compare ICE to the new Oracle Database Machine, which Oracle calls the “world’s fastest database”.
While you can’t install ICE on a Database Machine because Oracle won’t let you mess with the configuration at all, it should be possible to build an equivalent out of off-the-shelf Sun hardware parts. The Database Machine runs Oracle Linux on Intel Xeon, which should be no problem for ICE.
How ICE would compare is hard to say. The software on the Database Machine is optimized to the hardware, with things liKE some querying processing offloaded to the storage server and compression to use the FlashCache. ICE on the other hard has better compression and might make better use of the FlashCache.
How funny it would be if the “world’s fastest database” turned out to be Oracle’s “other” database, a MySQL based solution
Post Comment